Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 09:54

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
At Chicago baseball stadium, Pope Leo makes his first pitch to America - The Washington Post
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Orton advances in the King of the Ring after the Paul Heyman Guys screw LA Knight - Cageside Seats
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Consequuntur dolor explicabo ipsa autem vel eos et.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Nintendo Switch 2 Size Comparison vs. Original Switch vs. Steam Deck - Gizmodo
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Astronomers Have Detected a Galaxy Millions of Years Older Than Any Previously Observed - WIRED
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.